Legal Opinion

Speakman v. International Pulverizing Corp.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 21, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Two of the complainants in this cause are residents of this state and four are non-residents. The defendants have applied for an order requiring the non-resident complainants to give security for costs in accordance with section 8 of the Chancery act (Revision of 1902). 1 Comp. Stat. p. 413.

In the case of Jones v. Knauss, 33 N.J. Eq. 188, Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet held that a non-resident complainant will not be required to give security for costs if he is joined with a resident complainant, which practice seems to have been followed in this court.

The statute in effect at the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. MyersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Marino v. Shiff Realty Co.Court of Common Pleas of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Jones v. KnaussNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gerace v. BentleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API