Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyee

delivered tbe opinion of the Court.

This appeal comes to this court directly upon ¿ stipulation of facts. The question for determination is what interest, if any, appellants-defendants have in the realty in controversy. For reasons discussed herein, we hold that they are possessed of no interest therein.

On August 20, 1883 one James Perry executed a warranty deed to Mrs. Harriet Hurt, John Hurt and Sarah Jane Hurt, conveying a tract of 154 acres of land located in Humphreys County, Tennessee. Mrs. Harriet Hurt was the mother of the other two grantees John and Sarah Jane Hurt. As a result of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Runions v. RunionsTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Manhattan Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. BedfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cottrell v. GriffithsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Holt v. HoltTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Roney v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scheibel v. HillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. General Insurance Co. of America v. Commerce Bank of St. CharlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. St. Louis County v. Village of ChampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Fraker v. FrakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API