Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Gregory Bell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 28, 2015No. 08-3037, 11-3032Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilkins, Circuit Judge

I join the Court’s opinion upholding Bell’s sentence. I part ways with the majority, however, on Wilson’s conviction. In my view, the District Court violated the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by forcing Wilson to continue his defense with replacement counsel who had been absent from court during the earlier testimony of key government witnesses. Because this error requires reversing Wilson’s conviction and remanding his case for a new trial, I respectfully dissent.

I

The Supreme Court decided United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984) and Strickland v. Washington,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API