Legal Opinion
Poysa v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 19, 1979No. Claimant No. 60851; Claim No. 60852PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas J. Lowery, Jr., J.
The claimants seek damages caused by the discharge of rock *270and water on their property allegedly due to the negligence of the State in the design and reconstruction of East Shore Drive (New York State Route 34) in the Town of Lansing, County of Tompkins, New York. The claims were bifurcated and jointly tried solely on the issue of liability.1
On June 12, 1975, D. & T. Franzese Bros. Inc., under a contract with the State of New York, commenced work on the reconstruction of that part of East Shore Drive known as Esty’s Hill. The project generally…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Ferri v. AckermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Engblom v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Santangelo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1980
- Village Community School v. AdlerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Robilotto v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1980
- Dunckley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.