Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Hotchkiss

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon• Norman Woodson, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

The controversy herein grows out of litigation between Margaret Hotchkiss and the Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias over a benefit certificate for $3000 on the life of her husband, payable to her at his death. It seems that during the lifetime of the insured he became unable to pay his dues or assessments for the insurance, and, under a by-law of the Supreme Lodge authorizing it, the local lodge (Denison No. 3 of Texas), of which insured was a member, entered into a contract with him whereby it agreed to pay his dues and have a lien on the certificate for reimbursement. Said lodge did pay them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Missouri Bottlers' Ass'n v. FennertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Borchers v. BarckersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Kane v. BorthwickWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Anthony v. CarpCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1901
  5. Borchers v. BarckersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State v. ByrnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Bentrup v. Johnson and Lehmann.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Symmes v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. State v. IvanhoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API