Louthain v. May

This action was instituted by the appelleeagainst the appellants for the recovery of personal property. Verdict and judgment for the appellee, from which appellants appeal.

The only assignment of error argued is that based upon the ruling denying a new trial.

It is contended with much earnestness, that the appelleefailed to make out his case, for the reason that the evidence did not show that the property in controversy was detained in the county of Cass. We need not examine or decide whether it was essential that the property should have been shown to have been detained in Cass county, for the…