Legal Opinion

Truglio v. Julio

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1984No. 16016, 16021PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEELY, Justice:

These two cases are consolidated in this opinion because they present similar issues that concern the res judicata effect of magistrate court judgments. The appellant in Finnegan v. Becklekimer, Mrs. Finnegan, attempted to dismiss her cause of action in magistrate court, after her hearing, but before judgment was rendered, in order to begin the action anew in circuit court. In Truglio v. Julio the appellants, Maryann and Frances Truglio, were denied the opportunity to have a proper hearing to determine whether a default judgment should be set aside. For the reasons given below,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cordell v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bailey v. SWCC and Eastern Associated Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Home Sewing Machine Co. v. FlodingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Johnson v. RogersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. West Virginia Div. of Labor Contractor Licensing BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. SER Jon Veard v. Hon. Lawrance S. Miller, Jr., JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Sines v. BallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Martin v. W. VA. LABOR CONTR. LIC. BD.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Heather Mulcare v. Mike Ferris, T/A Mike's Muffler & Brake ShopWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API