Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Cione

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1987No. 10805PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

Petitioner Adam Armstrong (“Petitioner”), in his Application for Writ of Certiorari, alleges that two errors were committed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals: (1) the court erred in affirming the circuit court’s conclusion that the jury did not reach an inconsistent verdict when it found Respondent-Defendant Jack Cione (“Respondent”) was negligent in causing Petitioner’s injury but did not breach Respondent’s implied warranty of habitability; and (2) the court erred in holding that the circuit court’s grant of a directed verdict against Petitioner’s strict…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Craft v. PeeblesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Johnson v. Scandia Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API