David-Hodosh Co., Inc. v. Santopadre
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.
The defendants, Antonio and Anna Santopadre, are husband and wife. They seek a reversal of an order entered in the Superior Court denying their motion to vacate a default judgment entered against them on September 23, 1971. Hereafter, we shall refer to the plaintiff as “Hodosh” and, where appropriate, to the defendants as “Santopadres” or “Antonio” or “Anna.”
Hodosh wholesales meat and meat products. At one time or another, Antonio was a jobber, and would buy from Hodosh and sell to the retailer. Hodosh commenced its suit on June 16, 1971. Its complaint consists of two counts. The first count…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- King v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Metcalf v. CerioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Ktorides v. KazamiasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
- Fiske v. MarinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
- In Re Wells'petitionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Flynn v. Al-AmirSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Vieira v. Davol, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Kaufman v. RaySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Holdgate v. ActonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000