Legal Opinion

People v. Fiore

New York Court of Special Session

Decided December 6, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of speeding. At the conclusion of the testimony and after both sides had rested, the trial court examined appellant’s driver’s license which was not in evidence and commented on previous traffic violations therein set forth.

It was reversible error for the court to look at the license before conviction. Such practice should be scrupulously avoided in the future, since it is a clear violation of defendant’s rights.

We do not say that the decision would have been different if the Magistrate had not seen the defendant’s license before *469rendering Ms decision. Suffice it to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. Semonite, New York County Courts1959
  2. People v. MurdockNew York Court of Special Session · 1964
  3. People v. Hartgrove, New York County Courts1958
  4. People v. Patton, New York County Courts1961
  5. People v. Covert, New York County Courts1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API