Springfield Consolidated Water Co. v. Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Appellee sued to recover under a schedule of rates filed pursuant to an order of the Public Service Commission made after complaint and hearing. All municipalities served by the utility were charged for each fire service, hydrant and lines thereto. The City of Philadelphia resisted the claim because the ordinance granting appellee the right to supply water contained a stipulation for free use of the pipe lines arid water for fire and school purposes in the twenty-second ward. The city also 'set up an additional defense in the failure to give proper riotice of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Town of DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Leiper v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- City of Scranton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Southern Iowa Electric Co. v. City of CharitonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WidovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Rogoff v. the Buncher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- City of New Haven v. New Haven Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.