Stiffler Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
This is an appeal from a denial of benefits to appellants under the Unemployment Compensation Law, §401, as amended, 43 P.S. §801(f) (2).
The facts in this case as determined by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review follow. Both appellants took excused absences from their employment due to maternity in 1966. Under company policy, such excused absences could extend up to eighteen months, unless terminated sooner by the employee. After being certified by their physicians as able to work, they reported to the employer in February 1967 (well within eighteen months of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Small Tube Products, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Semanisin Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- Valdez v. CantorColorado Court of Appeals · 1999