Legal Opinion

Arkwright v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1968No. 24895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510 (88 SC 1770, 20 LE2d 776), holds that “a sentence of death cannot be carried out if the jury that imposed or recommended it was chosen by excluding veniremen for cause simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed conscientious or religious scruples against its infliction,” and the Supreme Court specifically made its decision “fully retroactive” in application. The record on this habeas corpus hearing shows that veniremen were excluded for the reason that they were opposed to capital…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whitus v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jones v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rawlins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lingo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Brawner v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. Arkwright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API