Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Finnegan v. Mayworm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1858PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Information in tbe nature of a quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

An information, in the nature of a quo warranto, having been filed against the defendant, to inquire by what authority he assumes to exercise the office of sheriff of the county of Houghton, and suggesting that Michael Finnegan is entitled to the office, an informal plea was put in, claiming the office, and denying any usurpation; and the. facts are agreed upon.

On the 30th day of September, 1856, an election was held pursuant to statute, in Houghton county, for the election, among other officers, of a sheriff for said county, for the term commencing January 1st, 1857. For said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Hart v. PhillipsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Board of Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. People ex rel. Benoit v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. People ex rel. Hudson v. DeMillMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Wattles ex rel. Johnson v. UpjohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API