Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Bruhwilder

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1915No. 6421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma, County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. ■ Proceedings against C. F. Woodward by August Bruhwilder. From the judgment, Woodward brings error.

1Per curiam

This appeal was docketed in this court on May 16, 1914, and was submitted on December 6, 1915.

The plaintiff in error has filed no brief, nor asked for an extension of time within which to do so, nor given any explanation for his failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). The defendant in error has filed a motion, asking that the judgment be affirmed. This motion should be granted. Chamberlain v. Fearnow, 46 Okla. 101, 148 Pac. 138; Simmons v. Berryhill, 48 Okla. 98, 149 Pac. 1131.

We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Annear v. SwartzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Chamberlin v. FearnowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Simmons v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. KaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Tackett v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924