Legal Opinion
Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board. (See, e.g., Matter of Gravest v. Tide Water Oil Sales Co., 275 N. T. 583, affg. 249 App. Div. 911; Matter of Lowery v. Riss & Co., 10 A D 2d 489, mot. for lv. to, opp. dem 8 N Y 2d 707.)
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burice, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim in the following memorandum in which Judge Scileppi concurs.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Claim of Graves v. Tide Water Oil Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rainear v. C. J. Rainear Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment BureauNew York Court of Appeals · 1967