Legal Opinion

Karsman v. Futrelle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1931No. 21715Published

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

Mrs. Sam Karsman complains of the judgment of the superior court of Chatham county sustaining a general demurrer to her petition in an action against A. U. Futrelle, trading and doing business as Holmes & Co., and W. J. Hinley, who- are principal and surety respectively upon a garnishment bond. It appears from the petition that, in a pending suit and based thereon, A. H. Futrelle caused garnishment proceedings to be initiated in the municipal court of Savannah, returnable to the superior court of Chatham county, and pursuant thereto caused several summons of garnishment to be issued and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Futrelle v. KarsmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API