Legal Opinion

Trousdale's administrator v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 1, 1872PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Case 17 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Hardin’s Rep. 301, Bell v. Rowland. MS. Opinion, Winter Term, 1871, Morton v. Morris. 1 Bibb, 443. 4 Mon. 37. 5 J. J. Marsh. 261. 4 Dana, 505. 5 Bush, 451. 16 Wendell, 447. 9 Wendell, 297. 4 Bickens 110. 4 Barb. 168, Watkins v. Stephens. 6 Barb. 588, Carshore v. Huyck.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PRYOR

delivered the opinion oe the couet.

In the month of May, 1872, the present action was instituted by the administrator of Matthias Trousdale, deceased, against the appellee, John Anderson, upon an account for money loaned him by appellant’s intestate in the year 1855, amounting to three hundred dollars. Anderson pleaded the statute of limitation, and thereupon appellant filed an amended petition, alleging a promise by Anderson to pay the debt within five years prior to the institution of the action, etc. An issue was made upon this amended pleading, and the court below, after hearing…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hargis v. Sewell's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Dowell v. Dowell's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. City of Louisa v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Roper v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API