Legal Opinion
Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. Croman Corp.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided April 4, 2008No. C.A. No. 1:07-1483; MDL No. 1649Published
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the entire Panel *: Defendant Croman Corp. (Croman) has moved, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate our order conditionally transferring the action to the District of Connecticut for inclusion in MDL No. 1649. Plaintiffs Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. and Helicopter Support, Inc., oppose the motion to vacate.
After considering all argument of counsel, we find that this action involves common questions of fact with the actions in this litigation previously transferred to the District of Connecticut, and that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- In Re FMC Corp. Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re Crown Life Ins. Premium LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001
- In Re Helicopter Crash Near Wendle Creek, British Columbia, on August 8, 2002United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004