Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Cain

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 1, 2025No. 2:20-cv-00172Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON FRANK G. HUDSON, Case No. 2:20-cv-00172-IM Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. BRAD CAIN, Respondent. IMMERGUT, District Judge. Petitioner Frank G. Hudson (“Hudson”), an individual in custody at Snake River Correctional Institution, brings this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(“Section 2254”) challenging his 2008 convictions for murder, aggravated murder, and abuse of a corpse. Because the state-court decisions denying Hudson’s claims are entitled to deference, the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API