Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Blackall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 21, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Intervening Petitions, against a receiver. Appeals from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. Consolidated by order of the Appellate Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

It is urged that the appellant Charles E. Morrison, executor of the estate of Ezekiel Morrison, deceased, is not entitled to prosecute either of these appeals, because he did not make formal proof of the death of Ezekiel Morrison, and that he was his duly constituted executor.

Charles E. Morrison, as such executor, on the 9th of April, 1895, came into court, asking that he be made a party, as such executor, to the various petitions, already filed, of the Chicago Title & Trust Company, as assignee, and upon the same date A. H. and E. S. Blackall, appellees, came, asking that they be made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Smith v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. De Wolf v. Royal Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  3. Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. MorrisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API