Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Bryan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1924No. 24,057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

When this case was here before (153 Minn. 198, 189 N. W. 935), it was held that there was a sale of the cow in question and a memorandum of the contract of sale sufficient to satisfy the requirements of section 4 of the Uniform Sales Act. [G. S. Supp. 1917, § 6015-4.] The opinion then proceeds as follows:

“Had nothing further appeared, the property would have passed to defendant, and plaintiff would have been entitled to sue for the price under subdivision 1 of section 63 of the act. But evidence was received as to what occurred subsequent to the bid in relation to this cow. Many…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Rees v. StormsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Sargent v. BryanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sargent v. BryanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. B. A. Griffin Co. v. Northwestern Fish & Seafood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Erickson v. BjertnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Bryan v. SargentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API