Legal Opinion

Haugen v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1926No. 8749PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This statement of the nature and result of the suit, conceded by the appellees to be substantially correct, is taken from appellants' brief:

"The plaintiffs C. A. Johnson and A. M. Wold, on the 1st day of November, A.D. 1923, filed suit in the district court of Jackson county, Tex., in trespass to try title, against the defendants, C.J. Haugen, Aline Haugen, Aksel Haugen, Joe Haugen, Henry Haugen, Magnus Haugen, and Dan Haugen, as heirs of one John K. Haugen, to recover 166.5 acres of land in Jackson county.
"The petition contained the usual allegations in an action of this kind, and stated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BurkittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Hardy v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Himes v. HimesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Jones v. SelmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Hinds v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Box v. UsseryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Himes v. HimesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API