Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Greenberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 10, 1997No. 96-2647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the trial court erred when it included the furnishings given to her by her parents and her engagement ring as marital assets in equitable distribution. We reverse and remand because her engagement ring is non-marital property.

About one year prior to marriage, appellee gave appellant a diamond engagement ring. Three months before the wedding, appellant’s parents purchased several pieces of furniture. The furniture was delivered to appellant’s apartment after the parties were married. The trial court found that appellant’s parents intended the furniture to be a gift for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gill v. ShivelyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Gainesville Bonded Warehouse, Inc. v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guardian. of Halpert v. Rosenbloom, PaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. In Re StoltzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  3. Malone v. MaloneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API