Legal Opinion

In Re Assmt. Against Lytle Inv. Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 2, 1935No. 42758PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On November 18, 1933, F. Price Smith, as county treasurer of Woodbury county, pursuant to section 7155 of the Code, demanded of Lytle Investment Company, C.F. Lytle Construction Company et al., appellees herein, an amount of taxes that had been entered by said county treasurer on his tax list against appellees, claimed by said county treasurer to be due, with interest and penalties, upon property subject to taxation that had been withheld, overlooked, or for other cause not listed and assessed. On December 7, 1933, appellees made an application to the state board of assessment and review to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  2. Woodbury County v. TalleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. In re the proposed listing, assessment & collecting of taxes by the treasurer of Woodbury County upon the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N & HORSESHOE ENTERT.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Kennecott Corp. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hubbard v. MarshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Broadway Petroleum Corp. v. City of ElyriaOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Iowa Department of Revenue v. Iowa State Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API