Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Doskocz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 10, 1991No. 91-1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPE, Judge.

The question presented for review is the effective date of section 222.21, Florida Statutes (1989), which exempts retirement and profit sharing plans from the claims of creditors. We conclude that the trial court correctly interpreted the statute and affirm the order under review.

In 1987 the legislature enacted section 222.21, Florida Statutes. Ch. 87-375, § 1, Laws of Fla. With an exception not applicable here, the statute provides that “any money or other assets payable to a participant or beneficiary from, or any interest of any participant or beneficiary in, a retirement or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tampa-Hillsborough Cty. Expressway Auth. v. KE MORRIS ALIGN. SERVICE, INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Flammer v. PattonSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. State v. AiuppaSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Bartlett Cooperative Ass'n v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Smith v. Daniel Mones, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commerce Bank, N.A. v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  2. Beardsley v. Admiral Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. VFS Leasing Co. v. Markel Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  4. Graham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Graham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API