Legal Opinion
1350 Lake Shore Associates v. Hill
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 29, 2001No. 1-00-1119PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
The plaintiff, 1350 Lake Shore Associates (LSA), appeals from a circuit court order, entered following a bench trial, denying its petition for a writ of mandamus directing the defendant, Christopher R. Hill, commissioner of the department of planning and development of the City of Chicago (Commissioner), to issue it a “Part II Approval” letter (Part II Approval), a necessary prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for construction within a residential planned development. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
At all times…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lewis E. v. SpagnoloIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Noyola v. Bd. of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. B.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
- People Ex Rel. Skokie Town House Builders, Inc. v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- 1350 Lake Shore Associates v. HealeyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- 1350 Lake Shore Associates v. Mazur-BergAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- 1350 Lake Shore Associates v. CasalinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Lombard Historical Commission v. Village of LombardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- 1350 LAKE SHORE ASSOCIATES v. RandallAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.