Legal Opinion

Lansalot v. Mihaljevich

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1929No. 11,481PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

Plaintiff sues for rent in the sum of $750, claimed to be due on six notes of $125 each. Defendant admits the execution of the lease and notes, but resists payment on the claim that plaintiff, the landlord, during defendant’s absence from the premises and from the city, took forcible possession and appropriated defendant’s movable property, which was contained in the leased premises, and which was worth $1,400.

In his testimony defendant admits that, at the time of the forcible entry by the landlord, three of the rent notes were matured and unpaid.

This . default, the landlord claims, matured…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pelletier v. SutterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucas v. LudwigLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Rivers v. TessitoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Butler v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Robinson v. BonhayeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Stroope v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API