Legal Opinion

Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 1990No. 89-1490PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We address all of the issues raised in this appeal and affirm.

Trial counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress the bus search of appellant’s luggage was not ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant’s case preceded Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989). At the time of the crime and the direct appeal, case law permitted police officers to board buses temporarily stopped in stations and to conduct random consent searches of passengers’ luggage. See State v. Grant, 392 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 4th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCrae v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Bostick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. State v. GrantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Elsleger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Weidner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Aurelio Javier Ortiz v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  4. Hayes v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  5. Isidore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API