Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Banks

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1999No. CR-98-0167Published

1Dissent

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion reversing the trial court's ruling suppressing the admission into evidence of Banks's statement. In Anderson v. State, [Ms. CR-95-0768, May 8, 1998] 729 So.2d 900 (Ala.Cr.App. 1998), this court held:

"By its own terms, Rule 11(B) applies where a `child' is taken into custody and questioned by law enforcement authorities. The Alabama Rules of Juvenile Procedure do not define the term `child.' However, that term is defined by statute as `[a]n individual under the age of 18, or under 19 years of age and before the juvenile court for a matter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API