Field v. Dadon

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lawrence Newmark, J.

This action was originally commenced to recover for legal services rendered to the defendant. Upon the defendant’s failure to appear, a default judgment was entered against him on May 27, 1982. Plaintiff thereafter served defendant with a subpoena duces tecum in connection with enforcement proceedings. Defendant failed to appear at the time and place specified in the subpoena, and plaintiff then moved to punish him for contempt. By an order dated October 5,1982, Honorable Gerard D’Emilio (District Ct), the motion was granted and defendant was fined a…