Legal Opinion · Dissent

Application of David M. Griver

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 6, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7309Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

The issue here seems to me to be whether the subject matter sought to be patented is obvious under the conditions stated in 35 U.S.C. § 103. I do not believe the majority opinion decides this issue according to the prescribed statutory tests. Rather, it seems to me the majority opinion is based on the visual similarities between Fig. 1 of the appealed application and Fig. 2 of the British reference patent. Such a comparison seems to me to ignore the requirement of section 103 that the decision as to obviousness must be based on “the subject matter as a whole.”

While purporting to decide that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re WesslauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Warren R. AttwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Hoerr v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API