Legal Opinion

Reed v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 2, 2000No. 14-98-01134-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTED MAJORITY OPINION

DON WITTIG, Justice.

The majority opinion issued in this case on January 13, 2000 is withdrawn and the following opinion is issued in its place.

This appeal concerns the degree of evidence of incompetency that necessitates a competency hearing by the trial judge. Appellant, Joseph Reed, entered the Gucci Department of Saks Fifth Avenue, selected an aqua green mink fur coat, placed it in a Lord and Taylor bag, and attempted to leave without paying; he was charged with felony theft and possession of a controlled substance. Each indictment included two enhancement…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Collier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Sisco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Redwine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. State v. ByrgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  4. Raul Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Diana Lorrayne Howell v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API