Legal Opinion

Fosket v. City of Dixon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2013No. SD 32084PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J.

Sheila Fosket (“Fosket”) filed suit against the City of Dixon (“City”) alleging City was negligent for injuries she sustained when she fell after stepping on a manhole cover on a street under the custody and control of City. Following submission of Fosket’s evidence, Fosket moved to amend her pleadings to add a res ipsa loquitur claim against City based on the evidence at trial. The trial court denied her motion. The jury returned a verdict for City. This appeal followed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Factual and Procedural Background

On August 81, 2007,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Weaks v. RuppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Bonnot v. City of Jefferson CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Hale Ex Rel. Hale v. City of JeffersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Armed Forces Bank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Joseph Weixeldorfer vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri, et al.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API