Legal Opinion

Michael v. Pugel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 2022No. A173482PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

564 On respondent Kurz’s petition for reconsideration filed January 19, and appellant’s response filed February 2, reconsideration allowed, opinion ( 316 Or App 786,

504 P3d 1231

(2021)) modified and adhered to as modified March 23, 2022 Deanna MICHAEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rochelle PUGEL, Defendant, and Michael KURZ and Kurz Construction, LLC, an Oregon domestic limited liability company, Defendants-Respondents. Yamhill County Circuit Court 19CV09140; A173482

505 P3d 1108

Ladd J. Wiles, Judge. Thomas M. Christ and Sussman Shank LLP for petition. Kevin T. Lafky, Amanda L. Reilly, and Lafky &…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Michael v. PugelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael v. PugelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API