Michael v. Pugel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
564 On respondent Kurz’s petition for reconsideration filed January 19, and appellant’s response filed February 2, reconsideration allowed, opinion ( 316 Or App 786,
504 P3d 1231
(2021)) modified and adhered to as modified March 23, 2022 Deanna MICHAEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rochelle PUGEL, Defendant, and Michael KURZ and Kurz Construction, LLC, an Oregon domestic limited liability company, Defendants-Respondents. Yamhill County Circuit Court 19CV09140; A173482
505 P3d 1108
Ladd J. Wiles, Judge. Thomas M. Christ and Sussman Shank LLP for petition. Kevin T. Lafky, Amanda L. Reilly, and Lafky &…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Michael v. PugelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael v. PugelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022