Stone v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
The law governing this case was settled in Stone v. Sinclair Refining Co., 225 Mich. 344, and Stone v. Sinclair Refining Co., 229 Mich. 103. The facts will be found fully stated in those cases, and need not be repeated here beyond saying that this action was brought under the survival act by the administrator of the estate of Esther Stone, deceased, to recover compensation for pain and suffering experienced by decedent during the four hours she lived after she received burns and injuries in an explosion of gasoline. Mrs. Stone was horribly burned, suffered intense physical pain and was aware…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stone v. Sinclair Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HesterlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Towns v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
- Swaczyk v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Collins v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Palmer v. Security Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Warrichaiet v. Standard Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.