Applebee v. Perry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Cass county, McClenaban, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The gist of the first two assignments of error made by defendant’s counsel in this case is that the instructions given by the court as to the proper application of payments were not sufficiently explicit, in that they “did not give the jury to understand” certain things. We do not agree with counsel upon this point. The instructions were clear, concise, and sufficient. Possibly they were not as full and explicit as counsel desired, but he should have so stated at the time. The law was given in a manner easily to be understood, and we have no doubt was fully comprehended by the jury.
It is well…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Rimmer v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Robertson v. BurtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- MacIllravie v. St. Barnabas HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Brown v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.