Bradshaw v. Miners' Bank
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
The brief of the appellants has been prepared with notable disregard of the requirements of our rule 2á (11 C. CV. A. cx.; 47 Fed. xi.). The so-called “statement of the case” is burdened and confused with matter of argument, and, in the order and form required, there is no specification of the error relied upon. See Vider v. O’Brien, 18 U. S. App. 711, 10 C. C. A. 385, and 62 Fed. 326.
The appeal is from an order dissolving a temporary injunction. The suit was brought by the appellants, Bradshaw and Henry, citizens of Illinois, against the Miners’ Bank, a corporation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Electric Manuf'g Co. v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Standard Elevator Co. v. Crane Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
- Andrews v. National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Vider v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LuptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913