Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Charleston & Seashore R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Buchanan, J., Charleston, January, 1901. Action for damages by Annie B. Carroll against Charles-, ton and Seashore Railroad Co. The following affidavits were submitted on the motion for change of venue: “Personally appeared before me, Annie B. Carroll, and being duly sworn, says that she is the plaintiff in the above named action; and “First.

Read the full summary

Before Buchanan, J., Charleston, January, 1901. Action for damages by Annie B. Carroll against Charles-, ton and Seashore Railroad Co. The following affidavits were submitted on the motion for change of venue: “Personally appeared before me, Annie B. Carroll, and being duly sworn, says that she is the plaintiff in the above named action; and “First. That the action in this cause was begun in this Court, on the — day of December, 1898, and came to trial at the November term, 1899, before the Honorable George W. Gage, presiding Judge, and a jury, at which term, after a long and protracted…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Pope.

This action was begun on the 6th day of December, 1898, in the 'Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County, in said State, for the recovery by the plaintiff from the defendant of .$15,250 because, as alleged, the plaintiff had been injured while a passenger on the line of defendant’s railroad company from the Isle of Palms to the city of Charleston, by the negligence of the said defendant. The defendant denied the injuries of the plaintiff, but alleged if she was injured, the same was the result of the contributory negligence of the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnston v. Belk-McKnight Co. of Newberry, S. C., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API