Legal Opinion

Kuehl v. Lippert

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1987No. Civ. 11218PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

This appeal raises the question whether a change in land values justifies relief under Rule 60(b)(v), North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, from the property distribution provisions of a divorce judgment. We hold it does not and affirm the order denying relief.

Theodore R. Lippert and Sharon E. Lip-pert Kuehl were divorced in 1983. The trial court valued their net marital estate at $470,000, of which $330,000 was ascribed to real property and improvements. As part of the property distribution, Sharon re ceived $34,000 she had inherited, $40,000 cash from Theodore payable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Lang v. Bank of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sinkler v. SinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Lippert v. LippertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Reimer v. ReimerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Fichter v. KadrmasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API