Kuehl v. Lippert
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
This appeal raises the question whether a change in land values justifies relief under Rule 60(b)(v), North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, from the property distribution provisions of a divorce judgment. We hold it does not and affirm the order denying relief.
Theodore R. Lippert and Sharon E. Lip-pert Kuehl were divorced in 1983. The trial court valued their net marital estate at $470,000, of which $330,000 was ascribed to real property and improvements. As part of the property distribution, Sharon re ceived $34,000 she had inherited, $40,000 cash from Theodore payable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Lang v. Bank of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Sinkler v. SinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Lippert v. LippertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Hamilton v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Reimer v. ReimerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Fichter v. KadrmasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.