Legal Opinion

Kyle Hayes v. The United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1978No. 77-2347PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

The plaintiff sought damages from the United States for erosion of a river bank and flooding of the low-lying areas of his farm located on the Yadkin River, downstream from the Kerr Scott Dam. It is alleged that the damage to the farm was caused by the operation of the dam’s flood gates. The district court dismissed the action under F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, relying upon the immunity granted the United States by 33 U.S.C. § 702c from liability for damage from flooding or flood waters.

While § 702c was enacted in 1928 as part of a comprehensive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benjamin T. Graci, Jr. v. United States of America, Philip C. Ciaccio v. United States of America, Emanuel Reid, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Ponderendolph v. Derry TownshipDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Richard McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Central Green Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Morici Corporation, a California Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. The United States of America, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Dennis Fryman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API