Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Sixth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2001No. 37472PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*698OPINION

2Per curiam

We are asked today to interpret NRS 202.055, which proscribes the sale of alcohol to those who are under twenty-one years of age, to determine whether the phrase “knowingly . . . [s]ells ... an alcoholic beverage to any person under 21 years of age” requires proof of either actual or constructive knowledge of the purchaser’s age. We conclude that actual or constructive knowledge of the purchaser’s age is' a required element of the statute; hence, because there is insufficient evidence of petitioners’ knowledge of the purchaser’s age, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Azbill v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Zamarripa v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Harris v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Valenti (Steven) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API