Strand Building Corp. v. Russell & Saxe, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.
In a rescission action, defendants move to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency (Bules Civ. Prac., rule 106).
The complaint alleges an agreement to purchase stock. In consideration for the purchase of, and the payment for, 5,000 shares of common stock of a designated corporation, the defendants, allegedly underwriters for the public offering of such stock, agreed in writing ‘ ‘ to deliver to ’ ’ the plaintiff an additional 500 shares if the plaintiff “ does not sell or transfer any of said 5,000 shares within ninety (90) days from date hereof.” And the writing further provides that in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Garvin v. GarvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Callanan v. Keeseville, Ausable Chasm & Lake Champlain RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Clark v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Clark v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984