Legal Opinion

State v. McCulla

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 14, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions'to the Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.

This complaint, charging the defendant with neglecting to remove a privy vault, declared by the board of aldermen to be a nuisance, was brought in the Police Court of the city of Providence, pursuant to an ordinance of the city. The defendant pleaded in abatement that the Police Court of the city of Providence had no jurisdiction of the offence charged, but that jurisdiction of the offence was in the District Court under the statutes of the State. The case calls for a construction of certain acts of the Genera) Assembly. Pub. Laws R. I. cap. 580, of March 17,1865, empowered the board of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pleasant Grove City v. LindsayUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Town of Barrington v. BlakeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  3. State v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API