Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Carlisle

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided July 1, 1896Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J., Hunt and Moore, JJ.,

concur.

Under the above title two suits have been consolidated into one and reserved from Special Term upon a bill of evidence. The suits are by creditors of the Great Western Mining & Manufacturing Company to enforce alleged liens upon the sum due to that company from the defendant, the Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad Company, on an account for coal. A large number of persons and corporations are made parties defendant as claiming liens upon the fund. They have filed answers and cross-petitions, and the case is submitted for a decree determining, first,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Risley v. . Phenix Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Brill v. . TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. James v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Peugh v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Goolsby v. BushSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API