Legal Opinion

Cimo v. Karstendiek

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1937No. 14999PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES J. RIVET, Judge ad hoc.

This is an appeal from the verdict of a jury awarding damages to the plaintiff and to his minor son, for the actual expenses of the former and physical injuries of the latter, attributed to the defendant’s negligent operation of her automobile.

An application for a new trial, after the verdict of a jury, was refused by the district judge with this comment:

“New trial refused although I do not agree with the verdict. It seems to me that defendant had no opportunity to avoid the accident when the little boy dashed in front of her. I feel further that it might be an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burvant v. WolfeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Guillory v. HoreckySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Albert v. MunchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. Jacoby v. GallaherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Dahlberg v. Shreveport Traction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stamps v. HendersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Rainwater v. BoatrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. McMinn v. LillyMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Tate v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Borman v. LafargueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API