Legal Opinion

Poma v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc. the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated December 18, 2002, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Anna Marie Poma did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

It is undisputed that the injured plaintiff was taken to the hospital immediately after the subject accident, X rayed, and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lesane v. TejadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. I Mei Chou v. WelshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Friscia v. Mak Auto, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API