Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Brown

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Several defendants demur to the complaint on the following grounds: 1. That this court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action. 2. That plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue. 3. That there is a misjoinder of causes of action. 4. That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

1Opinion of the CourtSears, J.

The Coats Manufacturing Company was a corporation organized under the Business Corporations Law of the state of New York, and its certificate *169of incorporation provided that the term of its exist-1 ence should he twenty years. The certificate of incorporation was filed in the proper offices in June, 1894, and the period of the corporate existence expired in June, 1914. At that time the Coats Manufacturing Company was solvent, and its assets were sufficient to liquidate its indebtedness,. and retire its outstanding capital stock. In June, 1914, when the corporation ceased to exist by limitation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bosworth v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. O'Brien v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Methodist Episcopal Union Church v. . PickettNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Sturges v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Central City Savings Bank v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garzo v. Maid of the Mist Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Addy v. ShortSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Addy v. ShortSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. In re Baldwin Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Wilson v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API