Legal Opinion

Kenworthy v. Richmond

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1917No. 13572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Walla Walla county, Mills, J., entered January 15, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for the alienation of affections.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. —

This is an action in damages for the alienation of the affections of the plaintiff’s wife. It was before *408us on a former appeal, and was reversed and remanded for a new trial because of error in the instructions to the jury. Kenworthy v. Richmond, 86 Wash. 127, 149 Pac. 348. It is now before us on an appeal by Richmond from the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury rendered at the new trial. A sufficient statement of the issues will be found in the earlier opinion. The errors assigned suggest but two questions: (1) Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict; and (2)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Speck v. GrayWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kenworthy v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyle v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bernier v. KochopulosWashington Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API