Legal Opinion

United States v. Entin

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 26, 1990No. 84-2422-CIVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCOTT, District Judge.

The plaintiff United States of America has brought this action pursuant to the False Claims Act. 31 U.S.C. 3729-3731. Reduced to its least common denominator, this case involves a calculated plan by three individuals and an international banking institution to defraud the United States Government out of a substantial amount of money. Specifically, the fraud was perpetrated in order to obtain a Small Business Investment Corporation license for the Miami Capital Corporation and, subsequently, to obtain funds from the Small Business Administration.

Following…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Donsco, Inc. v. Casper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Charles C. Hibbs, and Fairhill Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Charles HughesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Israel Discount Bank Ltd. v. Robert M. Entin, Alexander Halberstein and Kan Rap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. United States Ex Rel. Haskins v. Omega Institute, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  3. United States v. Cabrera-DiazDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
  4. United States v. KrizekDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  5. United States Ex Rel. Augustine v. Century Health Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API